How Do You "Fair"?

Over the course of the past few months, the publishing industry has become increasingly more and more depressed along with the economy. Publishers like Esquire, HarperCollins, and Publisher's Weekly have all either begun or announced layoffs to their editorial staff. It's discouraging to a lot of folks in the editing & publishing industry.

At the same time, there's uplifting news. As is evidenced by the errors in Value Expectations, The Examiner (just do a search for the word "fair" in the previous two articles), and this post about Valley News by Craig Silverman, there is still need for editors throughout the world.

Sites like The Examiner, Associated Content, and Helium are rife with errors (grammatical and factual), and it's getting worse because writers are continuing to send their work there for mere pennies. If we keep relying on sites like this, the quality of writing continues to decline, because there's no editorial process. It requires editors to make certain that work is clean, concise, and factual; without that step between writer and reader, there is no certainty that the work is truly readable. Just look at Wikipedia.

So what's the answer? Keep editors around. It's a simple solution, really. The editorial process, while seemingly ambiguous to most writers and adminstrative personnel, has one very clear goal: make writing - in whatever capacity (news, fiction, essays, etc.) - presentable to the audience.

Comments

I definitely agree that the lack of editors for many major publications stands out more than ever much to my chagrin. However I don't think that this trend will reverse in the short term due to the internet sidestepping the whole process of write, edit, publish. I do think that editing has a valuable place though, and will hopefully reemerge as journalism in particular is reinvented for a new age. And in wikipedia's defense, I think we all find it just readable enough to keep us coming back. Good piece. Links plz though.
Publishing quickly and with the least expense and highest profit is currently more important than publishing quality material. The Internet has cause a competition explosion, and our current economic situation only compounds the challenges publishing is facing. Sadly, until readers make it clear that quality matters and writers and editors take a stand on working for less than their efforts are worth, the situation will only get worse. We should value the time and work that people put into their words, and we should value those people who can take the words and ideas of others and make them better.
I appreciate a great editor, and so do my readers. But that is not the only problem with these penny-for-your-thought sites. The reporting and writing is atrocious. You get what you pay for. Unfortunately, there are a lot of amateur writers and international upstarts in emerging markets that continue to perpetuate this losing model. Stephanie

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.